When I was little, I was afraid of heights (to a degree, I still am). Therefore, you hardly ever caught me climbing trees or swinging high...anytime anyone wanted to elevate past my head level in any shape and form I was grounded..literally. The feeling of security given when my feet touched the ground was comforting. I knew from experience that the ground would be there...it wasn’t going to swallow me up whole (didn’t know much about earthquakes at this time). There were no pitfalls that I was aware of.
Fast forward to today.
I still get a sense of security by the ground being under my feet...this time with my operating system. I know that Linux doesn’t have any pitfalls, no security breached backdoors...because I can SEE the code. It’s like I am Indiana Jones being given a map of every single boobie trap before he enters the temple to get the artifact.
I see articles like OSWeekly’s "The Future of Publishing with Linux Magazines" and I chuckle a bit.
Mainly because PCLinuxOS Magazine will have its 12 monthly issue published next month. That’s right, we’ve been here a year. Now, I can’t take credit for this fantastic Linux resource because I only sponsor it and help make executive decisions regarding hosting and other things like that...it’s in the hands of great editors and contributors and is continually growing. The staff is well over 10 people strong and gaining.
You’d think that OSWeekly would take this magazine into consideration when writing this article...but they instead opt mentioning and considering the fate of Full Circle Magazine in the Ubuntu community. Now don’t get me wrong, Full Circle is a great magazine and we’re glad they’re also producing a quality magazine for their community...It just perturbs me a bit that the hard working editors, contributors, and proofreaders and layout/website designers that put together PCLinuxOS Magazine don’t get any mention or credit when it comes to online magazines.
So, I’d like to take some time congratulating PCLinuxOS Magazine...with a circulation of over 15 thousand for the PDF alone and nearing 10 thousand unique hits on the HTML Magazine that they simultaneously publish each month for low bandwidth users. Congratulations PCLinuxOS Magazine! For making a magazine not only interesting to PCLinuxOS users but to Linux users as a whole!
I see articles like OSWeekly’s "The Future of Publishing with Linux Magazines" and I chuckle a bit.
Mainly because PCLinuxOS Magazine will have its 12 monthly issue published next month. That’s right, we’ve been here a year. Now, I can’t take credit for this fantastic Linux resource because I only sponsor it and help make executive decisions regarding hosting and other things like that...it’s in the hands of great editors and contributors and is continually growing. The staff is well over 10 people strong and gaining.
You’d think that OSWeekly would take this magazine into consideration when writing this article...but they instead opt mentioning and considering the fate of Full Circle Magazine in the Ubuntu community. Now don’t get me wrong, Full Circle is a great magazine and we’re glad they’re also producing a quality magazine for their community...It just perturbs me a bit that the hard working editors, contributors, and proofreaders and layout/website designers that put together PCLinuxOS Magazine don’t get any mention or credit when it comes to online magazines.
So, I’d like to take some time congratulating PCLinuxOS Magazine...with a circulation of over 15 thousand for the PDF alone and nearing 10 thousand unique hits on the HTML Magazine that they simultaneously publish each month for low bandwidth users. Congratulations PCLinuxOS Magazine! For making a magazine not only interesting to PCLinuxOS users but to Linux users as a whole!
"It's not the big that beats the small; it's the fast that beats the slow." Niklas Zennstrom
There was a time early in the dawn of computers where .edu's and .orgs co-mingled ideas and thoughts via IRC and newsgroups in a conducive and non-proprietary way. The great ideas that were born from this still thrive today in the form of RFC's, Internet Standards, Protocols, and other surges of genius that sprung from these beginnings.
Lately however, certain things have begun to become apparent. Proprietary software vendors have locked the advancement of technology. This is to be expected. The open source movement is in full swing to counteract that. The only problem with the open source movement is in trying to counteract this huge pendulum and swing it from closed source proprietary toward a multi-source, multi-national technological advancement (for the gain of mankind and not company kind). Instead, open source has begun to push the stone uphill on it's own without assistance from the VERY companies that take from it.
The bottom line is that companies will take from open source without any inhibitions at all. But when it comes to defending that which they take, they shrivel into the shadows and hope no one notices them. Companies are not in symbiosis with open source...oh sure, some of them might be sympathetic to open source. As we've seen with the Linux Core Consortium, companies will pledge their favor but not their resources. But until ALL companies that take from open source give back through REAL support (financial or otherwise)...they'll continue to be identified as an entity that takes from another without providing anything in return. The word for that is PARASITE.
Companies that take from open source without giving back are a parasite to open source; they are killing it from within. The bad part about this is that we are helping this parasite...even applauding what it is doing. Many of us cheer when company X converts 250 computers to Novell or RedHat...but that isn't open source anymore! They're companies who happen to use Linux...they're just not pure open source no matter what their beginnings are or were. The support and recognition go to Novell and Redhat...the financial gain goes to those companies and not back into open source. Sure, they provide some packages and free-for-home-use downloads and other niceties to try and counteract things...but open source still loses. It loses because there are more takers than givers.
Open source advocates shouldn't be cheering when company X converts 250 computers it has to Novell or Redhat because they're just cheering for the company. Even when Linux becomes THE accepted alternative for business and enterprise applications we should refrain from cheering companies such as Redhat and Novell because the money they earn doens't go back into open source...and the name they make for themselves...does nothing for open source. No matter how hard they try, they'll always take more than they give.
Some of you might be saying, "But the simple fact is that when Company X converts to Linux, they are embracing Linux in general...not just the company that sells it. This means that they'll open up more to open source programs such as OpenOffice and Firefox". Perhaps. But I'd be more willing to believe that company X won't do ANYTHING that the vendor who provided them with Linux advised against...especially if warranty and license prevent it. So if said Linux vendor who provided them with 250 Linux desktops decided they didn't want Company X to use OpenOffice...that company wouldn't use it. The power of choice has been removed.
Until companies aren't afraid to offer FULL and unadulterated support for Linux (LSB 2.0 standard or the Linux Core Consortium) and free open source software, the open source movement will not succeed.
When his defense asked,"Which computer has Jon [DVD Jon] trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."