sorted by: recent | see :
popular
Content Tagged with FOSS + licensing
SpringSource Team Blog " Open Source, Open Strategy: The SpringSource Manifesto
"We are not changing and will not change the license of any existing project. The Spring Portfolio will remain under the Apache License. This covers the Spring Framework, Spring Security, Spring Web Flow and the rest of the Spring Portfolio."
Make Your Open Source Software GPL-Compatible. Or Else.
Making your OSS/FS software GPL-compatible
Possibilidades do OpenSolaris sob GPLv3.
artigo do começo de 2007 trata das possibilidades do solaris ser licensiado sob a GPLv3.
OSI Board approves GPL v3 and LGPL v3
Very welcome development.
Advice on relicensing from the SFLC
This has cropped up in several places recently (most notably on license-discuss) and the advice here seems sound to my non-lawyer eyes.
Advice on relicensing from the SFLC
This has cropped up in several places recently (most notably on license-discuss) and the advice here seems sound to my non-lawyer eyes.
gplv2/cddl dual-licensing
Stephen's comment on the addition of GPLv2 to NetBeans is fair comment is licenses are all about their terms, but I'm beginning to wonder if that's actually the case.
License:GPL: del.icio.us tag/gpl
OpenSolaris
foss
gpl
opensource
netbeans
licensing
License:GPL
Various Licenses and Comments about Them - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation (FSF)
list of free software licences and their compatibility with GPL
Law & Life: Silicon Valley: General Public License Version 3: A Legal View
I believe that the GPLv3 is a very valuable addition to FOSS licenses and solves many of the challenges faced by GPLv2. Companies distributing FOSS should consider it and companies using FOSS should be prepared, in most cases, to accept it.
The GPL and Software as a Service
Closing the SaaS loophole "would have been a death blow for GPLv3, making it impossible to adopt"
Will The Real Open Source CRM Please Stand Up? | Open Source Initiative
Micheal Tieman at OSI blogs about standing up to vendors who abuse the term Open Source for products which have licenses which don't meet the OSI Open Source Definition
Will The Real Open Source CRM Please Stand Up? | Open Source Initiative
Micheal Tieman at OSI blogs about standing up to vendors who abuse the term Open Source for products which have licenses which don't meet the OSI Open Source Definition
Make Your Open Source Software GPL-Compatible. Or Else.
This essay argues that developers of open source software / Free Software (OSS/FS) should use an existing widely-used license compatible with the General Public License (GPL), such as the GPL, LGPL, MIT/X, or BSD-new licenses.
Bob Sutor: GPL v3 In the home stretch
"For our part, we’re pretty satisfied with where we are. "
O'Reilly Radar: GPLv3, Apache License Compatibility
"sounds to me like the FSF really had to stretch to find some terms that might make the Apache License incompatible"
Page 1 | Next >>
