opensource: del.icio.us tag/opensource
Operating
System
Windows
opensource
technology
Environment
greenpeace
open-source: del.icio.us tag/open-source
Operating
linux
emulator
Windows
systems
open-source
emulate
Today I had a glimpse into the future of Apple’s Mac OS X, and I was more than a little frightened.
When I think about why I use my Powerbook so much and shun Windows whenever possible, the reasons are not what most people might think. I don’t care about the cost (okay, 200$ USD for Windows is a bit much, but I happily paid 130$ USD for the 10.4 “Tiger” Upgrade to OS X on our 12” Powerbook), and while I’m more than a little alarmed by the security problems endemic in Windows, I can avoid many of them by using Firefox, and Microsoft is slowly learning how to do the automated patching game.
No, the things that annoy me the most are those that you encounter when buying a new PC running Windows these days, turn it on, and …. you have at least ten things on your Windows TaskBar at the bottom of the screen. You have dozens and dozens of programs in your Start Menu, each of which has paid the hardware vendor money to be included on your PC, and does additional work to get your attention, such as popping up windows and more. The shiny new zillion mega-giga-hertz computer (usually with not nearly enough memory, of course) that comes out of the box has so much crap running on it that the machine grinds to a halt the first time you turn it on.Instead of a nice clean computer with an operating system to which I can add the programs I want to use, I have:
So, only through completely erasing the hard disk and reinstalling the operating system myself (which assumes that your hardware vendor trusts you enough to actually give you the media to do so) and then re-installing all the drivers myself and adding back only those programs I truly want, can I get a usable computer. For users such as your average parent or other non-power users, they are largely stuck with a very, very annoying system.
Thus, as both Samantha and I moved to Powerbooks as our primary computers, we’ve been more than a little relieved at how consistent things are, and how simple the Applications folder/menus typically are. System Preferences is nice and simple, with only QuickTime seeming out of place and something that should really be in a Preferences Dialog instead. Instead of the disastrous mess of C:\Windows\System32, applications are largely self-contained in their Application folder, and only sometimes add some goonk to the /Library folder, which largely seems to be manageable. Many of our friends, also moving to various iBooks and PowerBooks are finding the same—things are just easy to find.
Today, however, I installed the latest DivX codec for OS X, listed as version 6.5 It installed, in addition to the DivX codec (the only thing I really wanted):
Fortunately, they couldn’t come up with a reason to add an icon in the menu bar. Note to application authors and vendors: Just because a software feature is available does not mean you should actually use it. After a few minutes of scrounging around the hard disk in sudo’d shell, I found I was able to just delete the Updater and the other two Applications that were installed. You can also remove the System Preferences Panel without much hassle.
With Apple clearly on the upswing, and others clamouring to get their hands on the operating system and include it on their hardware, the pressure to add more software and make additional money will be immense. The only way to avoid having the OS X experience become every bit as annoying and aggravating as the Windows one will be to either force the vendors to agree to terms preventing them from doing this or to change the way in which OS X applications are written and certified by Apple.
In the latter case, for an application to be “approved” by Apple, the following rules might be enforced:
.app folder or in /Library for those applications which share. Application suites should have one .app folder for the applications and then maybe one additional folder for suite level stuff (read: Adobe, please don’t create SIX folders, each with sub-folders and their own crap, in addition to all the .app directories in my /Application folder).The last suggestion comes directly from my having spent nearly an hour on a friend’s laptop, trying to figure out why the network was not working. It turns out that the network hardware vendor had included a driver that replaced all Windows configuration for the network with a simple hardware configuration screen, and then created a new network device through which all traffic was routed. While I’m sure there is some situation where this would be extremely cool, in the 99,9% scenario, it’s gratuitously different and annoying.
Up until now, the best part of using OS X was that it was never that popular, and if a company did bother to release a piece of software for it, it was minimal and merely functionally adequate. Otherwise, there was probably great open source software to do what you wanted (i.e. Adium and VLC) Ironically, this basic functionality is pretty much all you really wanted. Now that the operating system is becoming more popular, people are starting to try and figure out how to make more money with it. Let the annoying begin.
opensource: del.icio.us tag/opensource
Operating
clone
compatible
opensource
source
open
Windows
Software
System
besturingssyteem