sorted by: recent | see :
popular
Content Tagged with XHTML + Markup
メタ情報をXHTMLに埋め込むRDFa | Web標準Blog | ミツエーリンクス
RDFaは、メタ情報をXHTMLで表現する仕様です。RDFをデータモデルに用いることで、より柔軟で多彩なメタ情報を埋め込むことができます。メタ情報を埋め込む方法は何通りかありますが、もっ
Validator.nu
No DTD-Based Validation of (X)HTML 4+5, REST APIs, RELAX NG, ...
XHTML vs HTML
Some good points but I feel it a little harsh to say there is straight up 'no need' for XHTML
DeWitt Clinton " Blog Archive " Why HTML
The thread started by Elliotte Rusty Harold (super smart guy, and a colleague of mine) called Why XHTML is provoking a number of intelligent and articulate responses. Here's my take:
DeWitt Clinton: Why HTML
"I'm pretty certain that the web itself wouldn't have succeeded if xhtml was required from the beginning, because a web that renders and displays documents is a much better web than one that throws validation errors all over the place."
XHTML 2 and all that ~ Jeffrey Zeldman Presents: The Daily Report
"Five months ago, I underwent a crisis of faith after reading a draft XHTML 2 specification that was deliberately incompatible with XHTML 1 and HTML 4. For weeks I was unable to work on my book, Forward Compatibility. The title seemed a lie."
Semantic obsolescence [dive into mark]
"Standards are bullshit. XHTML is a crock. The W3C is irrelevant."
Standards don't necessarily have anything to do with being semantically correct (kottke.org)
"[...] But what I feel like is being implied in the effort to get more people to embrace standards compliancy is that coding a page in valid XHTML with valid CSS involves improving the semantic meaning of the content...which is just not true."
Page 1 | Next >>