» tagged pages
» logout

sorted by: recent | see : popular
Content Tagged with events + Web2.0

All The TC50 Diggs, Feeds, Tweets, and Blog Posts You Can Handle

I know where I am going to be checking to see what people are saying about TechCrunch50 this week. The TechCrunch50 Aggregator. It is a site developed by Sean Percival to collect all the Twitters, FreindFeed comments, blog posts, news stories, photos, videos, Diggs,and Techmeme headlines that are tagged “techcrunch50″or “tc50.”

Even right now, in the middle of the night before the show starts, you can see a picture of the team still unloading boxes, read Robert Scoble lamenting via Twitter that nobody has yet leaked the list of TC50 finalists (ha!), and other various opinions.

The site is laid out in a Netvibes-like grid, with tabs across the top to narrow the results by source. If this helps filter and focus the noise around TechCrunch50, the same approach could be used for other events and topics as well.

What tags should Percival aggregate next?

Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.

Web2.0: TechCrunch

Calacanis, Arrington Talk TechCrunch50 On TechTicker

TechTicker’s Sarah Lacy interviewed Jason Calacanis and Michael Arrington about the upcoming TechCrunch50 conference. The first two segments are up. In the first segment, Lacy talks to the two about the origins of the conference and why they are so determined to end payola in tech events.

The conference is back on Sept. 8 and now dubbed TechCrunch50 for the 52 companies debuting at it. (Don’t ask.) It’s being held the same day as Demo this year and tech folks are choosing sides carefully. For a two-year-old conference, TechCrunch certainly has some big-name loyalists. Among its panel of experts are Marissa Mayer of Google, Marc Andreessen of Netscape, Opsware and Ning fame, Mark Cuban, Chad Hurley of YouTube, and some of the Valley’s most powerful investors. Not bad.

Center stage are the startups. Both Calacanis and Arrington are known for rubbing some people the wrong way, but even critics admit these are two guys obsessed with helping fledgling entrepreneurs. They don’t charge companies to present and spend hours with each one, helping founders hone their pitches.

In part two Lacy dives down into one of the trends we’re seeing with this year’s applicants: next generation virtual worlds. This is already big business, and tech advances are letting users do and see more with less bandwidth.

Segments 3-4 will be on TechTicker Friday.

Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0

Web2.0: TechCrunch

TechCrunch50 Is Oversold

The TechCrunch50 conference in San Francisco next Monday through Wednesday is now oversold. We had originally anticipated as many as 1,500 attendees (50% more than last year), but we blew through that number earlier this week and are now at around 1,650 attendees. The venue actually holds this many people without any problems, but we have to order more infrastructure stuff to accommodate everyone.

We will be cutting off ticket sales tonight at midnight or when we hit 1,700 attendees, whichever comes first, to get a final attendance count. So if you plan on attending, get on the ball now.

The final agenda is now on the TechCrunch50 site as well. Check the blog for regular updates.

Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.

Web2.0: TechCrunch

Submit Your Toughest Questions For VCs on TechCrunch50 Panel

We’re all gearing up for TechCrunch50 next week, and with all the startups and venture capitalists at the conference we thought it would be a good opportunity to talk about what it takes to get VC funding these days and whether or not venture capital even maters as much as it once did. I will be grilling a panel of VCs on what they are looking for these days, how spooked they are by the liquidity drought, and how the venture capital game in general is changing. The VCs on the panel will be Roelof Botha (Sequoia Capital), Raj Kapoor (Mayfield Fund), Ross Levinsohn (Velocity Interactive Group), Sumant Mandal (Clearstone Venture Partners), George Zachery (Charles River Ventures).

I’ve got plenty of questions for them, but would also like to know what you would ask them. Submit your questions in comments, and I will select some of the best ones to ask the VCs on stage. (If you like a question that’s already been submitted, you can second it (or refine) by replying to that comment). Here are some questions to get the ball rolling:

1. At what point does the lack of IPO exits start to impact what you will invest in today? And how?

2. You are still raising plenty of money, is it harder or easier to invest than in the past?

3. Have you seen any startups in the past three years that could be the next Google or Facebook?

4. Do startups even need venture capital anymore with so much angel and corporate money out there, and with startup costs for Web companies going down?

5. How are you competing against all the seed incubators popping up all over the place like Y Combinator, Tech Stars, LaunchBox, DreamIt, etc.?

6. What are the biggest problems that need solving that startups should be focusing on right now?

7. What business models will you absolutely no longer invest in?

8. Is there any danger of innovation dying in Silicon Valley?

9. What was the most memorable pitch you ever saw? What was the most effective?

10. Does Silicon Valley need a shakeout? Are we already seeing one?

I need ten more.

Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.

Web2.0: TechCrunch

TechCrunch50: We Need Student Volunteers, Last DemoPit Tables Have Opened Up

TechCrunch50 starts next Monday in San Francisco. We’re on track to sell out the 1,500 available tickets sometime in the next 48 hours. We’ll have a bunch of updates for attendees here and on the TC50 blog over the next few days.

Here are two updates now: We need more student volunteers, and we’re opening up the last five demopit spots to non-TC50 applicants.

Student Volunteers: Here’s the deal - work a day for us and enjoy the other two days free. Alternatively you can register for all three days for just $150 and skip the work. Frankly, volunteering for a day is actually fun, and you get to see the inner workings of a conference (ever hear about making sausage?). Either way, it’s great to have a lot of students at the event to round out the audience. Plus, everyone is trying to hire you. If you want to volunteer, email Tanya at TechCrunch dot com.

DemoPit: The TechCrunch DemoPit is a way for the 1000+ startups that applied to TechCrunch50 but didn’t make the final cut to participate. You get tickets for half the normal price and you also get to exhibit your company for one of the three days. Just like last year, you collect poker chips from attendees and whoever gets the most gets the last spot on stage at the end of the conference. We’ve sold most of these spots, but five are left and available to startups who want to pitch something new. Email Dan at TechCrunch dot com if you want to be considered, no later than Tuesday afternoon. After that we go to the printers for signage, and we need some time to review the requests.

More news soon. See you next Monday.

Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.

Web2.0: TechCrunch

Announcing A Grassroots Roundtable And 100 Tickets Available For TechCrunch MeetUp in Austin

Today, we are releasing 100 additional tickets for the TechCrunch Meet-Up in Austin, Texas with the team from Austin Ventures.  As previously reported, we are in town on Thursday, September 25 just in time for the Austin City Limits music festival.

Get your tickets now, as we only expect to release one additional round of tickets prior to the event.  We do have a handful of three day ACL passes, including backstage access and admission to the Austin Venture tent, to give away to sponsors and designated attendees.

Also, I will be hosting a Roundtable Discussion prior to the Pangaea Meet-Up, at the AT&T Executive Education and Conference Center located on the University of Texas at Austin campus.  This will be similar in format to the Mobile Web Wars Roundtable I hosted in July—two dozen founders, CEOs, VCs, and execs in a room talking about an issue, live streamed over the Web.  The theme of the Roundtable will be “The Web Starts at the Grassroots”.   It will focus on how to use the Web to build grassroots support for startups, brands, politicians, and social causes.  Look for a post from me later in the week with details on participants and access to tickets.  If you are interested in joining as a participant, please reach out to me via email this week.

The TechCrunch Austin Ventures Meet-Up will be held at Pangea, one of the hottest new venues in Austin. At Pangaea we will feature local start-ups and other sponsors, starting at 5:30 p.m. (central time) and running to 10:00 p.m. (or whenever they kick us out).

All of the proceeds from the TechCrunch Austin Ventures Meet-Up will benefit the Lance Armstrong Foundation, an organization uniting people to fight cancer – believing that unity is strength, knowledge is power and attitude is everything.

In addition to releasing tickets for the Austin Meet-Up, sponsorship opportunities and demo tables are now available for companies to show off their products. If you want to support the event, please contact Jeanne Logozzo or Heather Harde. If you are a member of the press wanting to cover the event, please contact Sarah Ross.

Attendee identification will be checked at the door. Tickets are not transferable and not refundable. If you use your name to purchase multiple tickets, your guests must arrive with you to check in at the door.

We look forward to seeing you in Austin.

Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0

Web2.0: TechCrunch

Japan’s Kao Chekki (Face Check) Proves That Vanity Apps Know No Boundaries

On Facebook, there is no shortage of apps that tell you what celebrity you look like based on your photo (FaceDouble is the most popular), but in Japan we like our vanity apps on our mobile phones. After all, the camera is built in. Take the case of Kao Chekki (Face Check) by J-Magic, a web company that was totally unknown until the end of April 2007, when it caused a Japan-wide frenzy with its free Kao Chekki service. By June 2007, the mobile site had registered an incredible 20 million requests, and continues to be popular to this day.

The service is quite simple and cleverly plays with human vanity: People submit their photograph from their cell phones to check which (Japanese and international) celebrities they resemble the most. Kao Chekki scans the pictures and emails back the top three celebrity matches, including percentage match, a few moments later.

Kao Chekki works very well with Japanese faces (trustme on that one), but seems to have slight problems with foreigners. Michael and Erick really don’t resemble Gori-san and Kiyokiba-san, respectively, do they? Although, Gori-san is known as a cut-up.

The site’s overwhelming success spawned a number of copycats, including a rather bizarre service called Koe Chekki (Voice Check): Here, users call a phone number, leave a short message and are then emailed back to their cell phones with a list of celebrities with similar voices. Okay, maybe that one won’t translate overseas.


Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0

Web2.0: TechCrunch

Keep It Simple: PhrazIt Offers 30 Character Long Reviews

The web is teeming with user reviews on everything from movies to VC firms. But with so many detailed opinion pieces available, getting to the bottom line can be difficult.

Today sees the launch of PhrazIt, a site looking to cut through the noise by offering users a tag cloud related to various topics on the web. Rather than employing a traditional star or numeric system to rate a topic, PhrazIt uses brief words or phrases no more than 30 characters long.

Once a user has chosen a topic on the site, they’re presented with around 25 tags that have been entered by other visitors. You can either add your own description, or you can click on one of the existing tags (the most popular tags will grow in size, allowing users to summarize a topic quickly).

One of the biggest drawbacks to PhrazIt is that all tags in the cloud are pulled from submissions from the site itself. Instead of searching through popular review sites like Amazon or Rotten Tomatoes, PhrazIt relies on user-submitted data. This works well enough for popular topics (like Batman, seen below), but it makes searches for less common topics a waste of time.

PhrazIt is the first company to launch from the DreamIt Ventures early stage startup incubator, which is similar to Y Combinator. The incubator is currently working with its first “class” of eleven startups, and will have its first exhibition day in early September.

Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.

Web2.0: TechCrunch

Japan’s super-advanced mobile web: Too unique to serve as a global blueprint?

Over one billion cell phones have been sold worldwide in the last year, but in the US or Europe, the mobile Internet is still catching on relatively slowly. There even was a heated debate in the blogosphere just recently whether the mobile web has a future at all.

However, this has never been a question in one specific region of the world: In Japan, since 2006 more people have been accessing the web through cell phones than through PCs. Is this a picture of things to come in other countries?

Not necessarily. The interplay of five specific factors paved the way for the success of the mobile web in Japan (where I live) and largely explains why it hasn’t taken off yet elsewhere:

  • the ubiquity of advanced cell phones combined with a vast selection of tailor-made services
  • tech-savvy customers who often had their first web experience on a cell phone
  • a reliable technical infrastructure
  • symbiotic business relations between carriers and content providers
  • relatively sound regulatory policy

Three catalysts for growth: superior phones, a lot of content and demanding customers
Japan’s image as a high-speed testbed for the world’s most advanced mobile technology is well-deserved. A staggering 90 million 3G handsets are currently in circulation. Over 70% of people in this nation of 127 million are subscribed to mobile web data plans. By way of comparison: The 3G penetration rate stands at 23.8% in the US (where 52 million 3G handsets are on the market) and at 11.1% in Europe. 15.6% of American mobile subscribers use the mobile web.

The country’s three main carriers (SoftBank, KDDI au and market leader NTT Docomo) are churning out around 100 different Internet-enabled 3G handsets per year, each equipped with a whole array of flashy functions (the iPhone made its debut in this country only last month). Japanese people use their “Keitai” for over-the-counter payments (e-wallet), as a commuter pass in public transportation, 2D barcode reader, health control terminal, dictionary, karaoke player, digital TV, music player, e-book, and much more.

Some handsets
even feature video transfer from Blu-ray recorders, alarm buzzers with direct connection to the nearest police station or voice-to-text translation. In June, Docomo introduced a home service for owners of Wi-Fi-enabled cell phones to access mobile web sites at a maximum of 54 Mbps.

The availability of cutting-edge phones is one reason why many Japanese people don’t own a PC but would rather browse the web exclusively on mobile devices. And it’s not just for short bursts. They never write SMS either but rather thumb-text push-mails, often containing little icons, emoticons and coded youth slang acronyms. Booking flights online, ordering clothes, auctioning off used stuff, gaming, paying for movie tickets via direct debit: all of this has been possible on Japanese mobile phones for years now.

Semi-walled gardens in a flawless technical environment
Japanese companies never tried to duplicate the wired Internet experience but rather developed unique mobile ecosystems specifically for deployment on cell phones. Docomo’s i-mode kicked off the boom when it launched in early 1999 and was quickly followed by proprietary web systems established by competitors.

Today, the mobile web in Japan is fast, sophisticated, technically stable, and easy-to-use. Users press one dedicated button on the phone and are online within seconds, usually starting to navigate via menus predetermined in the carrier’s landing page. Alternatively users can type in URLs directly to get to mobile web sites, which can then be conveniently browsed by using one-key shortcuts.

Accessing the fixed Internet is also possible. Docomo, for example, uses a mix between a modified version of HTML and several i-mode-only protocols. This means that au’s EZweb subscribers are fenced out of Docomo’s web system (and vice versa). By the way: WAP never gained a foothold in this country.

But even in Japan’s mobile industry all is not well: Developers frequently deplore insufficient CSS, a lack of cookie and scripting support and restrictions imposed by operators and the Japanese government, i.e. especially with content regarded as harmful to children.

Powerful trio: Forward-looking politicians, carriers and content providers
Next to charging end consumers for their services, Japan’s mobile web operators generate revenue by making sites and content providers pay considerable fees for prominent positions in their default menus. Carriers also double as centralized billing institutions, significantly facilitating transactions conducted on cell phones. If a user downloads a game from an i-mode site, for example, Docomo keeps about 10% of the fee for itself. The content provider gets the rest, while the user conveniently pays the total via the monthly phone bill.

This means the business of operators and content providers alike is based on a 3-pillar kiosk model.

Carriers provide:

  • stable connectivity and technical infrastructure
  • system of timely and correct payment flows (for subscribers and content providers)
  • willingness to share revenues

This framework motivates content providers to ensure:

  • development of compelling content
  • advertising of their services
  • willingness to pay billing fees to carriers

This development was spurred by the Japanese government: To politically boost 3G adoption, carriers never had to pay a single Yen for mobile phone bandwidth. By way of comparison: In 2000 and 2001, the 3G licences in the UK and Germany were given out for $58 billion and $78 billion, respectively. In Japan, government policy was aimed at kick-starting a market, not to filling its own coffers. And it worked.

The country’s Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications says business carried out through cell phones in Japan was worth $106 billion in 2007 (up 23% from 2006), with m-commerce accounting for $67 billion and the mobile content market for $39 billion. Just one example: Cell phone owners downloaded music worth $10.2 billion, 42% more than in 2006.

Japan quickly managed to transform into a super-mobile society and this development might be hard to replicate, at least in the same way. What will be interesting to see is whether the mobile web emerging in the U.S. and elsewhere can leapfrog Japan by embracing more open standards and doing away with walled gardens. The jury is still out on that one.

In the meantime, Japan wouldn’t be Japan if it wasn’t thinking even further ahead. Think next-generation mobile networks: In March already, Docomo successfully transmitted 250Mbps packets in an experimental Super 3G system, planning to end preparations for the eventual launch by 2009.

(Photo by Matsuyuki).

Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.

Web2.0: TechCrunch

Thank You TechCrunch Sponsors

Sponsors make TechCrunch possible, and so we wish to thank the following sponsors for their support.

Seesmic, the video micro-blogging platform. Seesmic recently integrated its service with Link.Tv and announced that users can choose which of the six creative commons licenses they want to use when posting videos.

ServePath, the makers of GoGrid and other managed hosting, cloudware, and serving solutions

Codefortytwo, the maker of CrashPlanPro and other software

RackSpace, a provider of hosting services

eBuddy, web-services meta instant messenger

Logicworks, a hosting services provider

iDrive, the maker of web-based backup solutions

iNetU, a provider of managed hosting solutions

Geni, the premier web tool for bringing families together

BrightCove, an Internet TV Platform

MediaTemple, TechCrunch’s own hosting provider

SocialText, the maker of social software for businesses and organizations

3Tera, a provider of cloud computing services

Conduit, the makers of toolbars, including the CrunchBar

Interested in becoming a TechCrunch sponsor?

See details here or contact Dan Kimerling.

Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0

Web2.0: TechCrunch

TicketStumbler Aggregates Secondary Ticket Search

Y Combinator startup TicketStumbler has launched today. The Boston based company is an aggregator for the secondary ticket market, collecting tickets from brokers like Stubhub and Razorgator into one searchable database. Think of a kayak.com for sports tickets. The service essentially aims to spare users the trouble of searching through different secondary ticketing sites to find specific seats and prices. TicketStumbler has landed partnerships with several ticket brokers, and is working to expand their repository. They currently have 1.5 million listings representing 7 million total tickets.

TicketStumbler, founded by Dan Haubert and Tom Davis, is looking to take the forefront of the market by providing precise search options and solid user experience. The company’s main competition comes from Tickex, who also extends their service to concerts, but for the most part the space has relatively few contenders.

When comparing search results between the two sites it is clear that TicketStumbler provides a less cluttered interface without ads, ebay listings, and extraneous add-ons. Search results can also be viewed by seating location, allowing users to navigate through different sections to find the prime combination of price and location.

TicketStumbler hopes that by aggregating ticket listings they will spur competition between brokers and decrease transaction prices. They believe the service can further drop prices by driving traffic to brokers’ web sites, making them more willing to sell cheaper tickets. Depending on the broker, they will be taking 6-15% of the ticket sales that are conducted through their site.

The founders claim that the next steps involve pulling from more brokers and extending the service to cover more professional and college sports, with concerts and other types of events in the distant future. Secondary ticketing is a multi-billion dollar industry, so the revenue source is clearly there. Attracting users may well come down to having the most extensive ticket listings rather than the most user friendly service.

Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.

Web2.0: TechCrunch

The (Highly Controversial) YouNoodle Startup Valuation Predictor Is Coming

In February a well backed startup called YouNoodle said that they were developing a product that would accurately predict the future success of startups based on an analysis of the business and the founding team. Much like a credit rating tells creditors how likely an entity is to pay off debt, YouNoodle aimed to tell investors how likely they would be to see a return on their investment, and would even go so far as to estimate the exact valuation of a startup a few years into the future.

We were skeptical, to say the least. Particularly because the product was being announced while still in development.

Now YouNoodle is preparing to launch the predictor tool (sign up to be notified here). CEO Bob Goodson let me test the service out last week and shared some of the early results with me.

I’m still skeptical, but I love the valuation prediction for TechCrunch ($87.4 million), and I have to admit that some of the predictions are within a stones throw of accurate. And if people can be convinced that this is a useful way of understanding if a startup team has a chance of succeeding, it could become part of Silicon Valley culture.

The Prediction Tool

YouNoodle collects a lot of data on startups to make the prediction - the questionnaire takes a good half hour to properly complete. YouNoodle aims to make the prediction right before the first round of funding for a company. So one way to test it is to enter information about a more mature startup that was true prior to funding, and see how well it predicts the actual results.

The key factors in determining likelihood of success, says Goodson, are the team, financial factors, the concept and advisors. Details on the education, entrepreneurial experience and other information founder and key employee. The tool wants to know everything. For the founders, their age, education, previous startups (and how they did), and their long term relationship to the other founders. For the concept, YouNoodle gathers information on the business idea (probably extracting keywords for analysis), where it’s located, and lots of other data.

YouNoodle then churns all that data and assigns the company an index score from 1-1000 as well as a valuation estimate three years down the road. YouNoodle has tested and fine tuned their algorithm with 3,000 startups, Goodson says, and the results are “highly statistically accurate.”

As I said, TechCrunch’s valuation prediction based on 2005 information is just over $87 million. I won’t comment on that (woohoo!), but here are some other predictions, all made with data on the startups that was true prior to any funding:

Slide: $124 million (actual: $550m)
RockYou: $71 million (actual: $250m)
Mahalo: $118 million
Powerset: $104 million (actual: $100m)
Cuil: $95 million
Twitter: $110 million
Friendfeed: $86 million

Given that the information used to make the predictions was limited to that available prior to any funding of these companies, the data is both interesting and accurate enough to be useful. Slide and RockYou, for example, aren’t accurate, but the algorithm did predict success and it also got the relative valuations almost perfectly correct. Powerset was accurately predicted, and we’ll have to wait and see how Cuil and Mahalo do. Twitter’s valuation is probably close to accurate.

More examples: YouNoodle predicted that Google would be worth just $88 million three years after it was founded, which is lower than their private valuation at the time but now way off. Facebook’s valuation was predicted at $111 million, which is way off of its actual valuation. But the key is that YouNoodle would have predicted huge successes for all of these companies based on the exceptional teams put in place at the very early stages.

The average three year predicted valuation for student startups from top ten universities is about $360,000.

So the big question is, how does YouNoodle predict it will do based on its own algorithm? Goodson says it thinks YouNoodle will be worth $96 million in 2010.

How YouNoodle May Be Used

Goodson says he will provide the prediction algorithm for free to startups, even giving them a “certificate” showing their index score and predicted valuation (the one for TechCrunch is the top image above). If third parties want official access to the certificate they’ll be asked to pay (just as creditors are asked to pay for official credit reports). For now the service is being provided completely for free.

While the algorithm seems to do a good job of identifying teams with a high likelihood of success, it’s not clear to me that it does a better job than an experienced VC would be able to do on their own. YouNoodle is also basing predictions on historical data, and in a rapidly changing world that is consistently disrupted by new technologies, those predictions are very hard to make. Humans who are on top of recent developments can make subjective decisions that are far more likely to be accurate than an algorithm.

But YouNoodle is also dispassionate, and can therefore make decisions outside of the emotional world of startup investing. Venture capitalists are, despite their appearance, fairly risk averse people. If YouNoodle backs up their instinctive reaction to a startup they may be more likely to invest. And they may also walk away from an investment they like if YouNoodle says it’s destined to fail.

At the very least YouNoodle is going to add a fascinating layer to the conversation. The company has raised one round of financing (they aren’t disclosing the amount raised) from Max Levchin, Peter Thiel and The Founders Fund. In addition to Goodson, key employees include Kirill Makharinsky and Rebeca Hwang.

Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0

Web2.0: TechCrunch

ChaCha Cuts Pay Rate In Half, Prepares For Implosion

We’ve never been big fans of ChaCha, the human powered search engine that pairs you up with a “guide” who attempts to answer your questions in real time. The search model was obviously unscalable from the outset, but ChaCha’s botched implementation hasn’t helped much. When it first launched, ChaCha allowed users to initiate full on chat sessions with their guides, which predictably led to a flood of pranksters who overwhelmed the service.

After a year of trying to make the ridiculously flawed system work, the company abandoned the chat sessions in favor of one-off question and answers, primarily targeting users through a mobile service.

Despite its glaring issues, ChaCha has managed to ring up $16 million in funding, which is probably why it has survived this long. And to the company’s credit, it has amassed a following of loyal “guides” - the people who do the heavy lifting and find the search results for visitors to ChaCha.

Many of these guides are only interested in making a quick buck, which is why there are so many laughably bad search results. But for some, ChaCha is an extension of the workday, offering some relatively easy money to help supplement their incomes. And now ChaCha is going to screw them.

Yesterday ChaCha sent out a message to its guides explaining that it was introducing a “Pay-For-Performance” system that was designed to improve search quality - not a bad idea, given the shoddy results we’ve seen before. Unfortunately, it seems that ChaCha has blundered this plan too.

Under the new program, “Top Guides” will receive 20 cents per question, which has been the standard rate for experienced guides for some time. Everyone else gets 10 cents per question - half of what they would have gotten under the old system. To become a Top Guide, users must do the following:

* >95% Quality Measurement.
* 95% and above completion of answers to questions:
* Minimum 300 Searches a week.

That’s a lot of searches, given the fact that most experienced users average around one search per minute. In effect, ChaCha is forcing users to work five or more hours per week if they want the higher payrate - something that will totally alienate the site’s more casual (but accurate) users. What’s worse, there’s currently no way to readily see your accuracy score, so users are forced to trust ChaCha’s word.

Users are up in arms on the site’s private forum (you can see some of the complaints here), with many planning to abandon ChaCha entirely. It’s clear that ChaCha is trying to trim their workforce down to a small army of accurate and hardworking searchers, but enraging its entire community only seems to solidify its place in the Deadpool.

Crunch Network: MobileCrunch Mobile Gadgets and Applications, Delivered Daily.

Web2.0: TechCrunch

'Web Meets World' Competition: Win Tickets to NYC Web 2.0 Expo

This year the Web 2.0 Summit conference (5-7 Nov) is hosting an auction to benefit a few innovative organizations that are solving big problems.

To show our support for this initiative, ReadWriteWeb is running a competition in this post. We have 2 full conference passes to give away to the New York Web 2.0 Expo 16-19 Sept (value over $1000 each), as well as a free Expo hall pass (value $100).

At the last Web 2.0 Expo conference in San Francisco in April, Tim O'Reilly made a keynote speech that resonated with me and many others. He encouraged the audience to "not follow the headlines" and the hot consumer apps, but go after "big, hard problems". The Summit auction taps into this need.

According to a press release, the Web 2.0 Summit team "will solicit donations, and donation ideas, from individuals and companies within the community and then choose the 10 most promising and unique offerings to auction after the conference dinner." They've already lined up Tour de France legend Lance Armstrong, who will donate an autographed bicycle.

All proceeds from the event will benefit three charities, including WITNESS.org, which "uses video and online technologies to open the eyes of the world to human rights violations." You can suggest other worthwhile charities on this Facebook page. Also head over to the Summit website to find out more.

We think the auction is well worth supporting, as it fits within ReadWriteWeb's ongoing quest to find 'real world' uses for Web technologies. We'd love to see the Web being put to more use outside of the early adopter groups.

To be in to win one of the 3 prizes, we want to know: what would YOU bid on that web celebrities could offer? The 3 best answers, subjectively chosen by the RWW team, will win the prizes. Tip: both humorous and serious suggestions are welcome :-) Put your entry into the comments below. You'll need to enter your email address, so we know how to contact you, but this isn't published. We'll announce the winners by end of this week.


Web2.0: Read/WriteWeb

This Week on CrunchBoard

Here are some of the jobs listed on CrunchBoard over the last week:

Additionally, we’re looking for a Ruby Developer to join us here at TechCrunch HQ (Atherton, CA).

International readers can check our British and French job boards as well.

Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.

Web2.0: TechCrunch

GumGum Rethinks Its Approach. Drops Flash

Music and movies may grab the most headlines when it comes to piracy, but many content providers on the web are also having trouble managing their images, which are easy to crop, resize, and copy. Some services, like Attributor, try to monitor and track offending images, but the ultimate solution may well lie in removing the temptation in the first place by offering cheap and easy to find legal images.

Earlier this year, GumGum launched an image licensing platform that was designed to help publishers quickly locate and license images. The site served as a content hub, offering a searchable database of images that could be licensed on a CPM basis or for free alongside an ad.

Unfortunately, every one of GumGum’s images was served as an embeddable Flash widget, which made them both clunky and annoying for publishers, as the images couldn’t be resized or modified. The use of Flash allowed GumGum to include their ads with the images, and also made it harder for people to rip them off (though you could always just take a screenshot). PicApp, a similar image search and licensing platform, uses Flash as well and suffers from the same issues.

Today GumGum has announced a new approach to their licensing platform, and this time, there won’t be any Flash involved. To use the system, users need only include a single line of JavaScript on their page. From there, they can include any image they want using a standard HTML tag. The pricing models will be the same: publishers can either pay a fee based on image impressions, or they can include ads on top of their images. GumGum’s new platform can detect licensed images and overlays the ad on top of it, so there’s no need to use a special widget.

Another key shift in GumGum’s new approach is its decision to stop acting as an image hub - you’ll no longer be able to search through content catalogs to find an image. Instead, GumGum says that it will connect you directly with the content providers, who typically offer their own databases. By taking this approach, GumGum is turning away from the typical consumer and is becoming more of a B2B solution for blogs and sites that frequently rely on licensed images.

GumGum isn’t going to be able to stop image piracy - there’s simply no way to get around the “Print Screen” function without including an annoying watermark. But businesses who can’t afford to be caught up with illegal content may well appreciate GumGum’s new more flexible system, provided the company can make good on its arrangements with content providers. The service has already landed some big customers, including MTV Europe.

In conjunction with the launch of the new platform, GumGum has annouced a Series A funding round of a reported $1.2 million.

Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0

Web2.0: TechCrunch

Defrag: Fixing Foundational Information Channels

One of the conferences we're supporting this year is Defrag. The topics that Defrag explores are very close to our hearts - OpenSocial, Attention, Next-Level Discovery, The Implicit Web, and more. One of this year's Defrag sessions that caught my attention is entitled: Fixing Foundational Information Channels -- Email, Calendars, RSS, etc.

On the Defrag blog, my eyes could cope with the stark white text on pitch black background just long enough to read this description:

"...this session starts with the premise that something is broken in our foundations. Email imagines every message as a letter (a discrete object vs. a thread or networked send). Calendars are silo'd islands of non-interoperability that hearken back to days of paper and the rolodex. And RSS, new as it is, is still delivering us "object-oriented" feeds, and not contextually-driven usefulness."

Defrag has snagged some interesting folks that "you don't normally hear from": Ilya from AideRSS, Yori from Timebridge, Deva from ClearContext, and Pete from Mailana. The moderator will be Jeff Nolan.

This sounds like a fascinating session. I still struggle with email overload, even despite my love of Gmail. Calendars are a mix of paper and web for me, which is an indication that I'm not fully satisfied with existing web calendars. And the point about RSS delivering us "object-oriented" feeds is a very good one - and an issue that we at ReadWriteWeb are intensely aware of and wanting to solve on our own blog.

We certainly don't have the answers, but the panel members are well informed with this issue of "foundational information channels". Perhaps our readers can suggest, in the comments, things for the panel to discuss.

Defrag is being held November 3-4 in Denver, Colorado. You can register for Defrag here. Entering the code "rww1" will get RWW readers $100 off of the early bird price.


Web2.0: Read/WriteWeb

Socialmedian Brings A New Take On News Filtering

There is no shortage of social news aggregators looking to help users cut through the noise on the web. Digg is by far the most popular, with similar offerings from Reddit, Newsvine, and a host of others. Today, Socialmedian (not to be confused with SocialMedia, the ad network) is launching its own take on social news. The site has just launched in public beta, and can best be compared to Digg, with some elements of Twitter and FriendFeed thrown in.

At first glance, Socialmedian bears more than a slight resemblance to Digg. Each story is ranked according to the number of votes (called Clips) that it has received, with an expanding tab for comments and sharing. Even the color scheme is very Digg-like.

Founder Jason Goldberg acknowledges that Socialmedian does share some features in common with Digg, but says that its focus is on helping you find stories that you’ll be interested in, rather than finding stories that are popular and appeal to the masses. To do this, the site allows users to create their own personalized networks, or chose from over 1000 existing networks. Each network monitors certain keywords for stories submitted across the entire site, and generates a list of related stories. Users can also specify RSS feeds they’d like to automatically pull stories from, and they can use a sliding “Noise” meter to limit the number of stories displayed.

Socialmedian also uses a Twitter-like follow system to help generate relevant results. Whenever you come across a story submitter than you particularly like, you can flag them as a “Newsmaker”. From then on, their stories will receive a higher ranking, and are more likely to appear on your main news feed.

Because the site is so young, it’s hard to get a feel for how well these filters work (the vast majority of the stories on my front page have fewer than 10 votes). The site has far more customization than Digg, but its ultimate success will lie in its ability to cut out the noise - something we won’t know until it has to deal with thousands of stories at once. The site will also see competition from other social news sites like Reddit, which mimics Socialmedian’s network function by allowing you to “roll” your own customized feeds.

Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0

Web2.0: TechCrunch

Predict The Future On WashingtonPost.com

Think you’ve got the gift of foresight? The Washington Post has partnered with Predictify, an online polling service, to create a “Prediction Center” that allows readers to vote on possible outcomes for selected stories. Users will be able to leave their predictions and discuss their beliefs on an integrated comment thread, with the most accurate participants appearing on a leaderboard. You can access the main Predictify hub here.

Predictify, which launched in 2007, goes beyond basic polling systems by integrating discussion features and monitoring a users’ accuracy score across the entire service. While there isn’t currently a way to weight one question more than another, the site’s algorithm does take into account the type of question and the accuracy rate of participants. Besides the Washington Post, Predictify is also found on The New York Times and San Francisco Chronicle’s sites.

To offer an incentive for users to take part in the polls, the site has also implemented a premium program that allows companies to sponsor a poll and reward the most accurate participants with cash. In return, these sponsors are entitled to the demographics data that the service asks for with each vote. CEO Parker Barrile says that at this point it isn’t clear if the Washington Post will be making use of this feature, but if it does it will clearly distinguish sponsored polls from normal content.

While this partnership isn’t groundbreaking by any means, it serves as a reminder that “old media” is willing to embrace the interactivity afforded by the web. Whether or not the Washington Post’s implementation of Predictify will be popular remains to be seen, but for now it’s a big score for the service.

Note: TechCrunch is syndicated to WashingtonPost.com.

Crunch Network: MobileCrunch Mobile Gadgets and Applications, Delivered Daily.

Web2.0: TechCrunch

TheFind Launches Its iPhone App In Private Beta

TheFind, a technology-heavy shopping search engine, is introducing an iPhone application for the site that it says should launch on August 4. The application allows users to search for stores in a region that are selling a particular product (the site claims a database of over 200,000 retail locations).

Because the app hasn’t been accepted to the Apple App Store yet, TheFind is going to hold a beta using Apple’s Ad Hoc application distribution program. If it works well, we hope to be able to offer similar beta programs in the future for other App Store developers.

The first 100 users to go here will be able to sign up for the beta. After submitting their iPhone’s unique device identifier (UDID), users will be able to download the application from the site itself. Typically Apple requires users to download applications through the App Store, but this Ad-Hoc distribution system allows developers to distribute their apps before they’ve been approved to a maximum of 100 users.

TheFind launched in its current format in 2006 (it was previously known as FatLens, a ticketing and shopping site). The new site is a shopping discovery engine, geared more towards finding new products than locating a price for a particular item. In 2007 the site acquired Glimpse, a womens’ shopping destination.

Crunch Network: MobileCrunch Mobile Gadgets and Applications, Delivered Daily.

Web2.0: TechCrunch

Piczo Launches Pseudo API

Piczo, a social network with a strong teenage following, has launched a new developer platform that allows users to quickly generate content from partner sites while helping brands increase their exposure on the network. Piczo has never reached near the popularity of mega-networks like MySpace and Facebook, but it continues to draw a sizable audience, primarily from the teenage demographic. In conjunction with the platform, the site is also launching “Piczo Powered Pages”, which effectively integrate the social network’s features into other sites. Users can try one out at eSPIN, a social network owned by Hearst Magazines that has already made use of Piczo’s featureset.

Included in the API are three new features: “Post to Piczo”, “Create a Page”, and “Piczo Toolbar”. The “Post to Piczo” function allows users to post items to their Piczo accounts from external partner sites, which include Meebo, Widgetbox, and Clearspring. “Create a Page” allows users to use pre-designed templates to generate new Piczo pages containing partner content. Finally, developers will now be able to partner with Piczo to become part of the page editor’s toolbar, which the site says allows them to become an “integral part of the Piczo product.”

Unfortunately, this new platform doesn’t share much in common with the dev platforms seen on Facebook and MySpace. Instead, it’s more like a handicapped API that doesn’t have much flexibility. The site may well expand this functionality over time, but for now, don’t expect to see a developer community spring up around Piczo.

That said, the new features should help make Piczo more competitive with the larger, more popular social networks like Hi5, Facebook, and MySpace. ComScore data shows the site slipping off over the last year, dropping from 12.9 million users in April 2007 to 8.4 million globally in June 2008. However, the site has seen impressive growth in the United States, growing from 655 thousand to 1.4 million in the same time span.

Crunch Network: MobileCrunch Mobile Gadgets and Applications, Delivered Daily.

Web2.0: TechCrunch

Redlasso Shuts Down In Response To Fox/NBC Lawsuit

Redlasso, the video site that allows bloggers to post clips of television content, has shut down its beta in response to a recently filed lawsuit by Hulu-backers Fox and NBC.

In May, Fox, CBS and NBC issued Cease and Desist notices to Redlasso for copyright violation, which the company largely ignored. In June the company established a “Media Advisory Board” headed by a number of ex-studio execs that they hoped would help smooth things over with the networks.

Since its launch eight months ago, Redlasso has seen exponential growth amongst bloggers, and can be seen on a number of top news, gossip, and political blogs. The site allows users to watch recorded feeds of a number of television shows, and “clip” potions of them for playback on their sites. Among the channels available are ESPN, Fox News, and CNN.

Redlasso records and serves all of this content from its servers, without legal license for any of it. The company has long held to the belief that it is protected by the first amendment, and that the snippets that bloggers distribute qualify for fair use (the embedded clips can only be 10 minutes long). Fair use may apply to the snippets, but the site is still hosting entire episodes, even if they are only available to approved bloggers.

The site will continue to operate for its Bussiness and “Radio to Web” clients.

Crunch Network: MobileCrunch Mobile Gadgets and Applications, Delivered Daily.

Web2.0: TechCrunch

Max Levchin To Facebook: Developers Need More Certainty (And A Payment System Would be Nice Too)

Slide was not too happy when Facebook temporarily pulled one of its most popular applications, Top Friends, from the social networking site for exposing too much profile information to people who were not friends.

Ahead of today’s F8 developer conference, I asked Slide CEO Max Levchin what Facebook could do to make developers’ lives easier. Not surprisingly, he’d like to see clearer rules about what is and is not allowed, as well as more formal, contractual partnerships between Facebook and app developers. (Facebook is expected to announce a tiered partner system today, and Slide may not qualify as one of the “preferred” partners because of the issues that led to Facebook’s police action).

Slide’s VP of Strategy, Keith Rabois, goes even further. He warns that if Facebook keeps shifting the foundation on top of which app companies are built it will threaten their viability. This might all sound like sour grapes, but coming from the biggest provider of apps on Facebook it does carry some weight.

Levchin, who was one the co-foudners of PayPal, also thinks that Facebook needs a universal payment system so that developers can start charging for apps like they can on the iPhone. The question is whether anyo