Yesterday afternoon, Intel’s CEO Paul Otellini seemed a little hazy on the future home for Intel’s Atom processor during the chip maker’s quarterly earnings call — a fact I don’t find all that surprising since the netbooks or mobile Internet devices the chips are designed for exist only in a marketer’s imagination and failed product implementations.
Otellini was excited about Atom, calling demand for the chip” robust,” but analysts pressed Otellini about Atom’s end market and whether the chip would cannibalize Intel’s low-end Celeron processor. The Celeron ranges from speeds of 2.13 GHz to 3.6 GHz, and is faster than Atom’s 1.8 GHz or 1.6 GHz. Otellini’s responses were less than a ringing endorsement of the chip. “[Atom] is less than a third of the performance of our Centrino (high-end mobile processor),” said Otellini. “You’re dealing with something that most of us wouldn’t use.”
Wait a second. Just weeks ago before the Computex trade show in June, Otellini told the Financial Times he anticipated a $40 billion market opportunity for Atom chips over the next few years. If most of us aren’t using these low-end chips, then who is? Otellini envisions the Atom chip for small computers in emerging markets that happen to have IP-based voice, but in late 2009 Intel will launch an Atom chip for smartphones. In emerging countries, a lot of computing is already carried out on cell phones, begging the question of where Intel’s demand for Atom is coming from. Will those products actually succeed?
As for cannibalization, Otellini said, “We do not see [Atom] replacing Celeron. If you look at the netbook products being built around Atom, they’re all lower-priced, lower features, smaller screen size notebooks aimed at first-time buyers or the second, third or fourth machine in a household. We don’t see any cannibalization.”
So Atom chips are designed for slow web access on cheap, portable machines that will act as the backup computer in my home. Wait, I have one of those already. It’s called a smartphone and plenty of companies already make processors for that market.
If this story interests you, check out our
upcoming conference:
Mobilize — Mobile Web Today and Tomorrow

mobile
intel
paul
otellini
intc
Technology-News
semiconductors
As we said they would a few weeks ago, Nvidia today showed off its line of Tegra chips designed for mobile Internet devices, becoming yet another entrant into the unproven market.
The Tegra chipsets are based on the APX2500 processor built for personal media players and navigation devices, but the Tegra target will be portable computers with screen sizes ranging from 4 to 12 inches. Pay close attention to news coming out of the Computex trade show in Taiwan this week, where more details should emerge from vendors using the Tegra chipset. Products based on Tegra will be out in time for the holiday season at the end of the year and cost about $200 to $250.
Also in the run-up to Computex, Intel’s CEO Paul Otellini told to the Financial Times his firm’s Atom chips (also aiming at MIDs) will chase $40 billion in market opportunities; Taiwanese computer vendor Asustek said it expected to double sales of it’s tiny Eee PCs in 2009 over this year. Even Dell is getting into the fray with a small computer. As products emerge, I’m eager to see how the market for the devices breaks down. Right now, the market opportunity is large because it’s ill-defined, with each vendor suggesting its own specs as the defining standard.
Will MIDs be small computers with voice as Otellini seems to think; phones with faster processing and media capabilities like Qualcomm, Apple and TI seem to envision; or will they be lightweight computers like the MacBook Air, Eee PC or what I bet the Dell effort is?

instruments
otellini
appl
intc
Technology-News
semiconductors
qcom