new is a template system, especially useful in conjunction with a simple text editor such as vi.hello

Here’s a really cool mobile gym concept that might actually be a good idea for most metropolitan cities with rivers. It’s a human-powered mobile river gym, all powered by people exercising in it.

What if you took every single calorie generated by people working out in New York City and put it to use like this?

You’d probably have a really great public transportation, just watch out for sweaty balls.
The River Gyms are, in essence, floating gyms designed to provide health amenities while floating along the Hudson and East rivers. Each gym is programed with a specific path set on a 15 minute loop moving from one point to the next. This means that each one of these devices can function both as a gym with a view and as a transportation system.
The design won the third place in New York Magazine’s 2005 Create a Gym competition, and it is certainly easy to see the appeal of one of these. Obviously, while the design proposal was specific for New York, pretty much any city with access to a river could be filled with these gyms.
Brought to you by: Zedomax.com
Human Powered Mobile River Gyms for New York!
amenities, Consumer, Cool, Design, design proposal, Earth, east rivers, Eco-friendly, Educational, Energy, Entertainment, Gadgets, Government, gyms, health, health, Industrial, metropolitan cities, minute loop, mobile gym, mobile river, new york city, public transportation, Re-use, sweaty balls, transportation systemhttp://gigastore.co.cc/index.php/amazon-kindle-new-wireless-reading-device.html high-contrast screen does a great job of simulating a printed page; large library of tens of thousands of e-books, newspapers, magazines, and blogs via Amazon’s familiar online store; built-in free wireless “Whispernet” data network–no PC needed; built-in keyboard for notes; SD card expansion slot; compatible with Windows and Mac machines.
reading
device
wireless
new
amazon
kindle
Apple’s second quarter 2008 earnings proved to be a huge blowout, though Wall Street reacted negatively to company’s conservative outlook. Well, they are almost always wrong on Apple - which is clearly a sentiment driven company.
Nevertheless, the highlight of the quarterly earnings was the supercharged Mac sales. The numbers match-up with recent reports that Apple was leaping up the US PC-sales charts. Revenues for the quarter were up 38%, highest since 2005 despite slowing iPod sales and scant iPhone sales.
Peter Oppenheimer, Apple CFO was conservative in his outlook for the September 2008 quarter giving many reasons, including “a future product transition.” Analysts from Technology Business Research think that “Product transition” is Apple-speak for cool new stuff. I concur. So what could be on menu?
TBR believes Apple will refresh its notebooks with the latest Intel Centrino 2 processors, which will improve performance and increase battery life. We think the company will do more than update internals, however. In addition to a redesign, TBR believes Apple will add TV tuners and may introduce a larger screen MacBook. To maintain the necessary product differentiation, Apple will probably use quad-core processors for the new MacBook Pros. iMac desktop PCs are not likely to get a dramatic overhaul, but Apple will probably beef them up.
What that means: Apple is going to do more than fine this coming quarter. Not only iPhone sales will goose up their revenues, the new products could add ore oomph to the company bottom line. The big cloud on Apple: Steve Jobs health.

My Chicago-based startup, The Point, helps people start campaigns for collective actions of all kinds, from organizing a poker game to boycotting a multinational corporation. We’ve been fortunate so far, enjoying steady growth, happy users, and money in the bank. (In February, we raised a $4.8 million round of venture funding from New Enterprise Associates). But hindsight is 20/20 and any entrepreneur, given the chance, would do some things differently.
In our case, we spent nine months developing extra features to accommodate our grand vision instead of focusing on what our users would really need. This cost us precious time, delaying our launch, originally planned for June 2007, to November of that year. Even after launch, the costs lingered — maintaining the extraneous features was a time-consuming distraction from improving the parts of The Point that people were actually using.
Thankfully, we caught on to what I call the curse of “vision overload” — when you put your vision ahead of your users — and quickly reversed course.
This month we’re delivering a major upgrade to The Point, our first release in months, and we’ve actually cut more features than we’ve added. While arguably less grand, it adheres to the critical success maxim of KISS, or “Keep it Simple, Stupid!” All founders face an inherent conflict between their most ambitious visions and the practicalities of execution. Below I explain how The Point addressed this uncomfortable compromise, and how you can learn to KISS, too.
Why didn’t we adhere to simplicity the first time around? We were certainly aware of the KISS principle — in fact, it was uttered frequently around our office — but we didn’t know how to measure simplicity. Obviously a site needs some core features, but where do you draw the line on value added? Our vision was to build a 21st century framework for collective action. This was novel, so how do you determine what is core vs. an enhancement?
The complexity occurred when we allowed vision to drive our feature set. Six months on, we’ve developed a few rules for determining what to leave in and what to leave out at launch.
1. If you don’t mention it in your 2-minute product demo, you don’t need it.
Whether demoing to colleagues or potential investors, we found ourselves glossing over certain features to keep from overwhelming our audience. In the end, the features we skipped over were the same features that went unused. If you can’t fit it into a presentation to a captive audience, then it’s almost guaranteed not to be a factor in the seven seconds the average web user takes to decide whether they’re interested in what you’re doing.
2. Don’t build a race car for foot runners.
Campaigns on The Point don’t go “live” until engagement reaches a critical mass (e.g. 100 participants), so everyone can be assured the campaign will have an impact. So to help organizers determine the tipping point for a boycott, we built a database of 150,000 companies that maps the financial vulnerabilities of boycott candidates like The Gap or Exxon Mobil. Users, however, were efficiently identifying potential targets through simple discussion forums. They didn’t need the fancy tools we had created.
3. Let users problem-solve with the basics first. Then offer the glitz.
We assumed that some campaign creators would want multiple administrators so they could share the responsibilities of management and promotion. Our vision for The Point included group governance, so we spent weeks building a system for proposing and voting on campaign developments. As soon as we launched, we realized that campaign creators managed this task just fine by sharing access to single accounts. The lesson? Sometimes it’s better to let users actually have a problem before you try and fix it; their solution is often simpler.
4. Proselytize your vision in your blog, not your product set.
There are better ways to promote your vision than etching it into your product with features that are unlikely to be used. Write about it on your blog! Speak with community groups on the purpose and potential of the site. Or make a video of yourself in the future talking about how your site changed the world.
Users care about whether you are meeting their needs, not your vision for the company. Save your vision for your investors. Had we focused on the factors that affect whether someone will become a user, we would have had a product out the door months earlier.

Andrew Mason is a blogger and founder of The Point. It is his first startup.

Earlier this week Crunchgear broke the news on two new upcoming Kindle models: a smaller form factor Kindle to be released this year ahead of the holidays, and a large screen (probably 8.5×11) to come sometime next year.
A couple of commenters in that post have pointed out that the large screen Kindle is perfect to target the college/university textbook market, a $5.5 billion market annually in the U.S. alone.
Most students still buy print versions of textbooks, and carrying them around is as big a pain as it has been for past generations of students. Most publishers now offer electronic versions of their textbooks - McGraw-Hill Education, for example, publishes 95% of their books electronically as well as in print. But there is no compelling device to read them on. The current kindle is too small, and laptops run out of power too quickly.
A new large screen kindle would solve those problems. The battery life is much longer than most electronic devices, and carrying a large Kindle is still a lot better than carrying ten heavy textbooks. Our guess is that Amazon will make a major push into the educational markets next year - it’s the only obvious reason to create a large screen Kindle.
Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.